|
Representing
the Following Underwriters







|
|
|
|
|
Reprinted
with permission from Export Today Magazine - August
1997
By Erika Morphy
Richard Kohn does not
give up easily when structuring a complex overseas trade
finance deal. "Don't take it as gospel when your
foreign counsel says you can't accomplish a particular
result," he advises. "He or she may merely
be saying they haven't done it before."
Kohn, a senior partner
at the Chicago law firm Goldberg, Kohn, specializes
in asset-based financing, particularly the use of overseas
inventory as collateral. Not that Kohn works much with
the borrowers in such transactions. His customers are
usually banks and other commercial finance groups trying
to better serve their clients, but who often run into
all sorts of obstacles to structuring one of these less
traditional deals.
These days, lenders are
indeed refusing to take no for an answer, especially
when prodded by more demanding borrowers. In the past
few years, banks and other commercial lenders have clearly
become more aggressive and flexible in their overseas
activities, while more nonbank financiers -- including
even freight forwarders -- have entered the trade finance
market.
So whether
your international business is large or small, take heart
-- it really is getting easier to float international
deals. Of course, you may have to spend a lot of time
on the phone urging your traditional lender to consider
new forms of finance. And if they refuse, you may have
to spend time searching out a new partner.
For inspiration though,
Export Today for its annual Resource Guide describes
five examples of transactions that would not have happened
were it not for a combination of tenacity and creativity
on the part of both borrower and lender. These deals
took place because the participants would not take no
for an answer.
Expanding
Your Borrowing Base
A manufacturer that exports
metal products received an unexpectedly large order.
It did not have the necessary working capital to begin
manufacturing, but it did have about $3 million in receivables,
$1 million of which were from overseas accounts. Unfortunately,
its traditional lender insisted on excluding the $1
million from the manufacturer's borrowing base.
The manufacturer purchased
an export credit insurance policy for a cost of some
$30,000 on its $1 million in receivables. In return,
the firm received a 75% advance rate from the bank --
$750,000, which was enough to meet the first order.
What's more, every time the manufacturer receives another
order from that same customer -- which tends to happen
four to six times a year -- the company picks up another
$750,000 for working capital, all for that initial $30,000
policy.
A broker
of export credit insurance, in this case Global Commercial
Credit (GCC) of Bingham Farms, Mich., helped this particular
manufacturer purchase export credit insurance for its
foreign receivables. Once the receivables were insured,
GCC then helped the company package the loan request for
its lender.
Using export credit insurance
to get a bank to lend against your foreign receivables
is not, of course, a new concept. But it was not until
the last few years that such an option has been easily
available in the United States -- the improvement being
due partly to the arrival of specialty brokers such
as GCC, and partly to new entries into the U.S. credit
insurance market.
Many come from Europe,
where credit insurance is widely used to finance export
transactions, says Victor Sandy, GCC's vice president.
"In the United Kingdom, there are at least 18 different
credit insurance companies [whereas] in the United States,
there are three or four big domestic credit insurance
firms."
"What
is happening now is that the European market has become
saturated, so companies are looking to the United States
to increase market share, usually by partnering with local
carriers and firms," he says.
Baltimore-based Fidelity
& Deposit, for example, was acquired recently by the
Zurich Group and Nederlandsche Credietverzekering Maatschappij
(NCM), one of the largest Dutch credit insurance companies.
"A few months ago Maryland Netherlands Credit Insurance
[the new company formed under the joint venture] began
offering a seamless policy insuring domestic and export
receivables and political risk coverage," Sandy
reports. "Their clients no longer have to coordinate
multiple policies."
GCC's role, Sandy says,
is to guide exporters to the right carrier, then help
the firm structure a deal attractive to a lender. GCC
has a list of lenders it works with, and it will also
work with an exporter's partner bank.
"We
understand what carriers need for a particular deal to
be profitable," Sandy says. "We know who has
what kind of appetite for what kind of deal, so we can
structure something acceptable to both sides."
Export credit insurance
can also be used to save other sorts of very specialized
deals.
One GCC client
of custom-built assembly line equipment, for instance,
refused to sell on open terms, because if the buyer defaulted
during the manufacturing process, he couldn't sell the
equipment elsewhere since it's built to client specifications.
The potential loss was very great as it took three months
to build, at a cost of $300,000.
Then one of the manufacturer's
long-term clients decided it no longer wanted to use
letters of credit. The solution? In this case, GCC put
together a nine-month contract coverage policy that
protected their exposure during manufacturing. Usually,
credit insurance takes effect only when a shipment leaves
the dock.
Late in the bidding stage,
a U.S. supplier of farm machinery learned about an opportunity
to make a $500,000 sale to a manufacturer in Colombia.
The buyer was already considering several other bids,
so the manufacturer had to make a competitive offer
immediately. But he did not want to offer open credit
terms for fear of buyer default. U.S. Export Import
Bank programs, meanwhile, were no longer available for
deals in Colombia.
The buyer
and seller negotiated a forfait transaction.
Forfaiting is a financing
technique in which payments due from the importer are
guaranteed by a bank in the importer's country. Forfait
is most suited for transactions involving deferred payment
terms over a number of years. Usually these are sales
of capital goods from manufacturers to developing countries,
such as those in Eastern Europe (where forfaiting originated
40 years ago). It is also often used in Latin America.
Essential to a forfait
transaction is the aval (the buyer's bank's guarantee
of the buyer's credit) and the promissory note the importer's
bank provides. In a typical transaction, the buyer and
seller negotiate an agreement regarding price and payment
terms. In the case of the U.S. sale to Colombia, the
two parties agreed to ten six-month notes for a total
five-year term.
Once the agreement is
set, the exporter or its broker consults a forfait house
as to whether it will purchase the transaction. The
forfait house gives an answer within a few days. What
the forfaiter is purchasing is in essence the aval and
promissory note from the importer's bank.
Because these documents
are negotiable instruments -- compared to a contract,
for example -- they are easily traded in the international
forfait market.
The exporter receives
from the forfaiter the entire price of the contract
over the five-year term, minus the forfait fee of course.
He or she is now free from buyer nonpayment default.
The exporter is liable, however, for the notes -- they
must be legal and enforceable. He also must ensure that
the regulatory requirements of the importer's country
have been met. The buyer, meanwhile, has gotten a good
interest rate (at least better than he probably would
have gotten at a local bank) on a medium-term deal.
The growing acceptance
of forfaiting is illustrated by London Forfaiters. Established
in 1984 in London by two people, the company now has
17 offices in 15 countries, says Chantel Wittman, vice
president of the Chicago branch. London Forfaiters is
unique as it is one of the few independent commercial
forfaiters -- most forfait houses are branches of only
the largest world banks.
"The old forfaiting
connotation -- that it is expensive and difficult to
use -- is changing," says Wittman. In most cases,
exporters can get a commitment within hours as to whether
a forfaiter will finance a potential deal, she says.
Much of the
growing acceptance of forfaiting is due not just to more
providers entering the market (London Forfaiters opened
their Chicago office at the beginning of the year, one
of the few forfait houses to locate a branch outside of
New York) but also to the increasing numbers of brokers
that specialize in such deals.
One such company is British-American
Forfaiting. "Most companies in our target market
hardly know how to spell forfaiting, much less access
it," says Robert Pennell, owner of the Houston
brokerage.
On the brokerage side,
he says, there are "a limited number of firms such
as ourselves that can structure these deals and place
them with these houses." There are about a dozen
European primary forfaiters with U.S. operations, Pennell
adds.
If nothing else, British-American
saves its clients a lot of legwork and time. "We
survey the market to get the exporter the best price.
If we go to one house and find they are off cover [won't
do business in] a particular country, we will find a
[house] where they do have an appetite for that deal.
One time we went to 23 different places," Pennell
says.
A U.S. medical supplier
received a $300,000 order from a new client -- a distributor
in Mexico. The distributor, however, could not afford
to have its capital tied up in a letter of credit. The
U.S. supplier, for its part, wanted to make the sale
but was afraid of taking a chance on an unknown customer,
especially in the wake of the peso crisis.
The exporter
arranged for a "discount" letter of credit.
In this case, the exporter's
bank, BankBoston, arranged payment terms with the distributor
that did not entail freezing a portion of its credit
line, as an LC would have. On the other end, the bank
paid the exporter immediately for the order. "The
buyer got better rates and terms than he would have
in Mexico, the seller gets paid right away," says
Ben Schwartz with BankBoston. "This is a very simple
technique that is not widely used by many banks."
Commercial
banks are becoming just as innovative as their nonbank
counterparts and competitors. Just getting financing on
your foreign receivables has become far easier in the
last five years, partly due to the growing number of clients
who are demanding such services. Many are smaller banks,
which now routinely lend against foreign receivables,
primarily through the support of the U.S. Export Import
Bank. In some cases, the change has been dramatic. First
National Bank of New England only began its export finance
program in the early 1990s, yet recently it was named
the 1997 Small Business Bank of the Year by Eximbank.
Larger banks
with global networks are also exploring new options and
avenues to keep existing customers happy, and draw new
ones. "We can see that our clients' business practices
are changing," says Thomas Kingston, managing director,
Global Trade, for BankBoston. "They are sourcing
more and selling more in unfamiliar markets. We are structuring
our financing and delivery capabilities to meet those
needs."
Like discount
letters of credit, many of these programs are based on
old techniques packaged to meet new needs. Royal Bank
of Canada, for example, has just announced a new loan
product to finance foreign accounts receivable. It is
similar in structure to most receivables finance programs
except it gives the company cash for 100% of the value
of its sales to pre-approved customers before the sales
invoices are actually paid. Executives from the bank believe
that their subsidiary, RBC Trade Finance, is the only
bank engaged in this particular activity in the United
States.
When
Your Assets are Overseas
A U.S. supplier of tableware
wanted a bank loan to expand sales in overseas markets.
The company owned about $10 million worth of inventory
that it planned to use as collateral for the loan. The
problem? Most of his inventory was stored in a warehouse
in Belgium, and under Belgian laws it was necessary
to have possession of the inventory for the lender to
be able to acquire a lien. The situation was further
complicated because the supplier needed day-to-day access
to his inventory in order to continue his operations.
"We brought in a
collateral control agent [a private agent that assures
that title and control of the assets are in compliance
with local law and the lender's instructions],"
says Kohn of Goldberg, who advised the lender in this
transaction. "We had an agreement with the warehouse
that inventory would never drop more than a certain
amount so at all times we knew a certain amount of inventory
was supporting our lien." The U.S. firm received
a $30 million loan from Kohn's lender client, using
the inventory of tableware in Belgium as part of the
collateral.
In theory,
asset-based financing for international trade is a relatively
simple process: a firm's accounts receivables, or its
inventory, or a mixture of the two, are used to secure
cash advances on a revolving basis. The lender then advances
a certain amount, 50% for example, of the inventory, and
perhaps 70% of the receivables. If the borrower defaults,
or if the receivables are not paid by a certain date,
the lender has legal rights to those assets.
In practice, however,
banks and other lenders have been hesitant to finance
against foreign based assets, especially inventory.
Unlike the United States, very few countries have national
regulatory systems that record titles to property. Lenders
have to notify other creditors as to their interest
in the collateral, and in many countries the process
is murky and full of loopholes. By contrast, in the
United States a lender can secure its own interest in
a borrower's collateral simply by filing a statement
with the U.S. Uniform Commercial Code.
Over the
long term this problem will likely be resolved. The United
Nations Commission on International Trade Law is in the
process of drafting legislation and guidelines to support
the international assignment of trade receivables.
In the short term, lenders
are already responding to the increasing demand, and
they are becoming more creative in securing liens on
collateral and receivables. To some extent, this growing
acceptance of asset based financing is even affecting
merger and acquisition activity in Europe.
"Many U.S. firms
have started to finance the acquisition of foreign subsidiaries
using the subsidiary's inventory for collateral for
a loan for the purchase price. Also, as more U.S. companies
establish subsidiaries abroad, they need financing for
those operations," explains Kohn. "It's becoming
more common for overseas inventory to be part of the
whole collateral package."
Logistics
Company as Finance Provider
University Medical, a
four-year-old company in California that markets high-end
skin care products, needed a cash inflow to increase
its international sales, which in 1995 totaled $3 million.
Until that point the company was relying primarily on
letters of credit to finance their global sales, says
Ray Francis, company president and CEO.
University Medical tapped
a new trade finance program offered by their logistics
provider and was able to increase international sales
to a projected $22 million for this year, mostly in
North America, Europe and Southeast Asia.
University Medical was
using Danzas as its freight forwarder for its Asian
business when the freight forwarder "approached
us with their [finance] program," Francis says.
Danzas launched Cash Forwarding
one year ago, partnering with Fidelity Deposit Insurance
Company, a credit insurance underwriter, and NationsBanc
Commercial Corporation to provide the service. Companies
insure their foreign receivables with Fidelity, and
then borrow against them at NationsBanc. Danzas acts
as the middleman and the sole contact for the client,
and of course, ships the goods.
"The
customers get the advantage of Danzas administering the
process," says Ronald Ruzicka, director of financial
services at Danzas. "It's a one stop deal -- customers
don't have to deal with a bank or credit insurer."
Although it basically
is a value added service provided by a non-finance company,
Cash Forwarding is no more expensive than many other
forms of financing. The rates users can expect to pay
for 60 days open account range from 2.25% to 2.5% [of
the invoice amount] depending on the deal, Ruzicka says.
"Just the interest rate alone at prime flat would
cost 1.5% for 60 days, and we are providing credit insurance
and administration and other related services for another
0.75%."
The first program of its
kind, Cash Forwarding could well be the start of a new
trend -- the merger of finance and logistics as one
service.
"Most
definitely you can expect to see more such one stop offerings
from logistics providers in the future," says Richard
Palmieri, managing director at Deutsche Morgan Grenfield
in their Logistics Group. "Supply chain financing
is very much an emerging trend that has been accelerating
in the last six months," he says. "The top five
to seven logistics providers in North America are all
in various stages of investigating this new concept."
This May, INTRAL Corporation,
an international logistics management provider, and
Mellon Bank announced their alliance, Mellon-INTRAL,
to offer "a seamless integration of trade finance
and logistics services," according to the company.
Mellon Bank is "putting
into a place a receivable purchase program," says
Martin Goodstine, vice president and manager, international.
The Bank
is also looking at purchasing overseas inventory for its
customers. "But that is down the road," Goodstine
says. "We need to better understand the issues involved."
|
|